“The key trend is longer parental leave. [And while that’s important], the challenge there is that doesn’t continue helping you throughout your working parenthood.” YES, this. It’s a direct quote from the Dear HBR Podcast episode: Are you Struggling to Balance Career and Family? interview with Daisy Dowling.
Posts about choosing, establishing, and rocking your career (as opposed to a job). You’ll find posts about career paths, career transitions, and career strategies.
Let’s take a look at my inbox. A question from a reader is as follows:
My college is – literally – the only higher ed game in town. And so even though I work in a staff job that I generally enjoy, there’s no upward mobility. I’ve been here for 3 years and I’m really ready to take on more challenging assignments. I’m in my early 40s and at a place in my life where I just am not interested in getting another degree (already have 2 Master’s). I’m trying to be patient but I just don’t see it happening. The people who are the next level up from me have been here for at least 8 years. What would you recommend?
I can already hear many of my readers nodding their heads. I know I can relate. In my last organization, I put in 8 years and still wasn’t at the level I wanted to be at. And the people who were in the job title I wanted? They’d been there 10+ years. I had proven my abilities – I had excellent performance reviews and was clearly capable of the next level of responsibilities. There just wasn’t a job above me to be given to me. Ultimately, I wasn’t willing to wait it out yet another couple of years…so I left.
So that would be option one.
Moving on to another organization.
You should do this only after you’ve 1 – made clear your desires to your boss, and 2- made a strong case for your abilities to take on something new. Repeatedly. Because it’s not fair to duck out on a
Perhaps it will, but if it does now, I don’t see that indication yet, and they don’t seem to care. Obviously, if someone leaves my team after 18-24 months to take another job, that other hiring manager doesn’t care about longevity and loyalty. So I’m guessing it doesn’t impact their careers, and so I continue to conclude that I’m the old-fashioned one here and that this particular bias of mine is one I just need to ignore.
Actually, I can think of one way it impacts their careers.
There are some interesting intersections in my (day job) as a Professional Development Manager and my career coaching. At work today, I was talking about appreciative inquiry theory. This is an approach to organizational and personal development in which we focus on strengths, possibilities, and a future-oriented vision. As you can imagine, it’s far more inspirational and motivating than focusing on problems, weaknesses, and gaps. And it made me think about how powerful that kind of approach could be for career planning, too.
If you think about where you want to get to, rather than how stuck – or miserable – you may currently be,
Sometimes you come across or use concepts at work that could just as easily apply to your career. Working for a LEAN enterprise, I can definitely tell you that LEAN is one of them.
What is LEAN? The concept comes from manufacturing (I think?) but it’s all about eliminating what isn’t needed to improve workflow and efficiency. Making things simpler, easier to understand, and faster to do, basically. At my work what it means is to streamline our standard operating procedures to the degree possible so that we can provide the highest-quality services, and continuously update and improve our processes through a feedback loop.
What do I think that has to do with career planning, though? Actually a lot.
Today I met up with a client who is wrapping up their postdoc in a few months and unsure where to turn next. I made an offhand remark during our conversation that while “alt-ac” (or alternative academic) career is the prevailing term, that many oppose this term. And with good reason, too. When over 70% of the jobs are, well, alt-ac, then it’s actually tenure-track or permanent faculty positions that have become the “alternative” career path. If you have to label us working outside of tenure-track faculty, some argue for using career diversity instead.
And I thought that the conversation would just continue on that same path, but she said “Wait, what?! I knew that there weren’t that many tenure-track jobs, but you’re saying chances are less than 30% that I’ll get one? I had no idea!” Sad, but true. But then here’s what she said: “What are your sources?”
Well, folks. That’s a good question that I’m tackling here today.